Grab a piece of that "code" and design - and impart it to city defenders. It really shows, especially as attrition increases. Inno has spent countless engineering hours honing the defensive battle capabilities and strategies in GbG, and GE for the opposing warriors.
Yggdrasil is still great, you wouldn’t pass on it because Attacking unit defense is better. ago It’s usually not an either/or question. It's downright scary just how dumb the defenders play. This is only for the army defending your city, and the game is stacked against you ever winning that fight against a half-decent attacker. PS: The fact that you can watch the insanity (aka battle replay) of the city attack battle play out, and shake your head adds insult to injury. It could be a more exciting part of the game if given a little attention to correcting the asymmetrical design and outcomes it has now. with any traditional fighting methods or boosts.
Most players do articulate the same mantra as you've posted: " We have no chance of defending our cities". The AI for city defense has an IQ of about 70 (lol), and it needs a solid brain boost to better represent players. So, yes, I would be all for making city attackers have to work much harder to secure their plunder attempt vs how easy it is now with just modest attack boosts. It wouldn't take much to level the playing field on the balance we have now between city defense and the range of attack power we're seeing (most of that attack is coming from city building turning into war power due to years of GbG focus, PvP Arena, and yes even GvG).
0 kommentar(er)
